#32 · Before the Assembly
What does deliberation mean and involve in practice? Who can deliberate, and under what conditions? How do design, context, and emergent practices shape deliberative outcomes?
—
A central democratic challenge is the widespread belief that “ordinary citizens” are not equipped to meaningfully engage with complex political issues. This skepticism undermines trust in participatory processes and reinforces technocratic or elite-driven decision-making. Deliberation addresses this by enacting a communicative process of careful reasoning and discussion, with the aim of finding solutions to given problems.
Despite differences, deliberation cultivates shared understanding and perspectives. Thus, deliberation is a creative and productive process that can be applied across various aspects of life and entails listening, mutual justification, reflection, and the willingness to reconsider views.
CCAs, as “mini-publics”, bring together diverse lived experiences to address climate-related issues in structured and supportive settings. But deliberation ultimately occurs wherever people listen to one another and engage constructively with what is said in a creative problem-solving way, rather than simply throwing ready-made opinions and black-and-white thinking at each other. The deliberative outcomes of CCAs emerge from the interplay of formal design, social contexts, and emergent practices. This includes ensuring equal speaking opportunities, balanced information, and attention to power asymmetries, and emotional dynamics through facilitation.
CCAs are structured through distinct phases: a learning phase prepares participants inputs, interactive materials, and group exchange; (oftentimes) a listening phase, that engages with stakeholders and the wider public through public hearings and submissions; a deliberation phase, in which information is critically assessed and recommendations formulated participedia.net; The final sessions typically focus on final decisions though comparing one or more options and their policy implications, using consensus or voting, sometimes supported by scenario analysis, roleplay.
At the CCA South Tyrol small moderated group discussions enabled participants to reflect on the inputs by people with expertise, share lived experience, question assumptions, and jointly formulate recommendations. They then exchanged with stakeholders from the organised public, who also deliberated in an assembly format Stakeholder Forum Klima, to exchange ideas. This experience strengthened both assemblies in formulating their recommendations, and showed stakeholders in particular that citizens can develop well-founded proposals.
A CA in the UK consciously rearrange the seating plan each session to expose members to a variety of viewpoints and prevent dominant narratives, ensuring a balance of gender, age, and attitudes towards the government.
Bächtiger, André, and John Parkinson (2019). Mapping and Measuring Deliberation: Towards a New Deliberative Quality. Oxford: Oxford UP,. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199672196.001.0001.
Burkhalter, S., Gastil, J., & Kelshaw, T. (2002). A Conceptual Definition and Theoretical Model of Public Deliberation in Small Face—to—Face Groups. Communication Theory, 12, 398-422.
Mendonça, ,Ricardo Fabrino, Lucas Henrique Nigri Veloso , Bruno Dias Magalhães and Filipe Mendes Motta. Deliberative ecologies: a relational critique of deliberative systems. European Political Science Review (2024), 16, 333–350. doi:10.1017/S1755773923000358
Pellizzoni, L. (2001). The myth of the best argument Power, deliberation and reason1 Definitions of deliberative democracy are anything but unequivocal. British Journal of Sociology, 52 (1).
Romeijn, J., & Roy, O. (2015). Individual and social deliberation: introduction. Economics and Philosophy, 31, 1 - 2.
Rosenberg, S.W. (2007). Rethinking Democratic Deliberation: The Limits and Potential of Citizen Participation. Polity, 39, 335-360.
